On Sun, 8 May 2016 17:28:14 -0500 Spam House <kthxplz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I will work on the proper cpu setup, thanks for the info. (I copied parts > of the cpu config from the previous setup however after you showed me the > issue with vendor id I should probably just redo it to be safe.) > > I will say I don't think I have successfully gotten the HyperV part > working. > > Is it correct that if my hyperv is spoofed properly I no longer need this > in my xml? > > <kvm> > <hidden state='on'/> > </kvm> > > I can't boot currently without having that in the XML. It would seem > changing the vendor ID would remove the need for this. With Hyper-v incorrectly exposed, regardless of exposing KVM, the worst you should get is a Code 43 in the guest. It should still boot. Unhiding KVM for a Windows guest isn't going to enable an performance features. _______________________________________________ vfio-users mailing list vfio-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/vfio-users
