Isn't there a plugin that can change such data before it gets processed? On 10 March 2018 at 08:47, Timothy D. Lenz <tl...@vorgon.com> wrote:
> Welllll, it gets better. Tonight I see VDR is grabbing guide data for 9x > and using it for 58.x. So 58.x data is now being lost. grrrr > > > On 3/9/2018 2:29 AM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > >> On 08.03.2018 22:38, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: >> >>> On 08.03.2018 22:13, Timothy D. Lenz wrote: >>> >>>> I was hoping it was something simple I could fix in the conf. I haven't >>>> worked on it or in linux in a long time and don't have the free time to >>>> figure it all out again. I'll have to look at this some other time. I am in >>>> the U.S. and these are ATA channels. They each have their own freq. and my >>>> guess is that they can use what ever numbers they want since they are on >>>> there own freq which they bought. >>>> >>> >>> Well, it's funny though that they use exactly the same IDs ;-). >>> >>> Sure they can do whatever they want, but there are a few basic rules that >>> should be followed in order to guarantee a reasonable coexistance. One of >>> them is that channels that are broadcast in the same area (like from the >>> same terrestrial transmitter, on the same cable or the same satellite) >>> should use unique IDs, even if they are on different transponders. One >>> of these IDs is the "transport stream id", which in your case is 207 for >>> both channels. This should be different. >>> >> >> For testing I added your new channel list to my channels.conf. >> Here's what my VDR reported upon startup: >> >> Mar 9 10:21:46 raspi4 vdr: [3134] loading ../cfg/channels.conf >> Mar 9 10:21:46 raspi4 vdr: [3134] deleting duplicate channel >> KWBA-HD,KWBA-HD:653028615:M10:A:0:49=2:0;52=eng@106,53=esl@106:0:0:3:0:207:0 >> >> Mar 9 10:21:46 raspi4 vdr: [3134] deleting duplicate channel >> LATV,LATV:653028615:M10:A:0:65=2:0;68=eng@106:0:0:4:0:207:0 >> Mar 9 10:21:46 raspi4 vdr: [3134] deleting duplicate channel >> ThisTV,ThisTV:653028615:M10:A:0:81=2:0;84=eng@106:0:0:5:0:207:0 >> >> With your old list I get no such log entries. So I guess somebody messed >> up >> with the TIDs, and the problem should be fixed there. >> >> Klaus >> >> _______________________________________________ >> vdr mailing list >> vdr@linuxtv.org >> https://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr >> > > _______________________________________________ > vdr mailing list > vdr@linuxtv.org > https://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr > -- -Tor
_______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org https://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
