Just looked at the trace I sent in my initial post and realised that I had selected a Diseqc command that I had modified while trying to diagnose the situation so my annotations < > were a bit misleading.
The following should be less confusing: Diseqc command list found = t v [E0 10 38 F4] W500 [E0 31 6B 04] W250 [E1 31 6B 04] W15 T Diseqc action = 1 Diseqc action = 3 Diseqc action = 7 Sending Diseqc command: E1 31 6B 04 < Wrong, should be E0 10 38 F4 > Diseqc action = 7 Sending Diseqc command: E1 31 6B 04 < Wrong, should be E0 31 6B 04 > Diseqc action = 7 Sending Diseqc command: E1 31 6B 04 Diseqc action = 2 Again, the final Diseqc command has been sent three times, not the three commands in the sequence they appear in the command list. Apologies for the confusion. Mark.
_______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
