On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Malcolm Caldwell < malcolm.caldw...@cdu.edu.au> wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 10:34 +0100, Matthias Dahl wrote: > > Hi. > > > > For certain situations, it'd be great to exclude some channels from the > > automatic channel update. For example, when one has entered a channel > manually > > which broadcasts wrong channel informations. With the next channel > update, all > > is overwritten. So one has to either completely disable the automatic > updates > > or live without the channel for the time being. > > > > I had just a quick look over the vdr source and figured it wouldn't be > too > > hard to come up with a patch to support something like this I guess. So I > > wanted to ask if this new feature would be considered ok for inclusion > into > > vdr-1.7.x or if there are reasons against it? Otherwise I would put it on > my > > todo list and get to it when I get some time... if no one else does it in > the > > meantime that is. :-) > > I deal with this type of problem by having two copies of the channel, > with one with rid=1. The one with rid=0 will be automatically updated > to incorrect values, while the one with rid=1 will not be updated, so it > can be tuned as needed. Can you have 2 channels without changing anything in the code? I had to change some functions to have this. I found that VDR deletes duplicate channels by default. What is rid by the way? > > > > Best regards, > > matthias. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > vdr mailing list > > vdr@linuxtv.org > > http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > vdr mailing list > vdr@linuxtv.org > http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr >
_______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
