I demand that Timo Laitinen may or may not have written... > Aaargh, forgot to change the vdr Digest from the subject to something > reasonable... sorry about the noise... Here's the same with a bit more > identifiable subject.
You forgot to correct the In-Reply-To header. ;-) > On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 12:00:02 +0100 > Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I demand that Timo Laitinen may or may not have written... >> [snip] >>> Just tackled with this one myself... at least if you used the e-tobi >>> repositories. There was a strange requirement for the library version, I >>> think it was something like libxine => 1.1.12 libxine << 1.1.13. >> Highly unlikely. > ... >>> Compilation went well with libxine 1.1.17 and the plugin and the >>> frontends work fine. >> 1.1.17? Did you get that from... I don't know, probably late next year? >> :-) > Oops, it seems my time machine had a programming glitch... Or, > alternatively, I still haven't learned NOT to trust my memory... I'm inclined to believe the latter: you keep forgetting. :-) > So, actually looking at it, it had Build-Depends > libxine-dev (<< 1.1.3), libxine-dev (>= 1.1.2) The specific versioning shouldn't be there. That sort of thing only belongs in the Depends header, and should be generated at build time. > I removed all version requirements, compiled it against libxine 1.1.7. (in > Ubuntu Gutsy) But, still, it works, :-) > although not perfectly (rapid motion, such as news tickers, are jumpy with > xxmc on openchrome when HW acceleration is on, not sure why) Sounds like an X problem to me, though it could just possibly be to do with xine-lib's xxmc support. >> That *is* the general form, though, and it's to do with the name of >> xine-lib's plugins directory and how the plugin build scripts get the >> directory name. > So (wrote he hoping), would things get better (regarding my quality > problems) if I changed to 1.1.2? Hopefully not ‒ unless you mean 1.2, in which case you'll see much the same as 1.1 hg wrt xxmc. > or to 1.1.11? Or is it just so that if it works at all, it's ok? Basically, if you upgrade xine-lib to a newer ABI-compatible version, you won't need to rebuild plugins (except just the once to get them using the new plugin directory naming scheme when you upgrade past 1.1.10.1). -- | Darren Salt | linux or ds at | nr. Ashington, | Toon | RISC OS, Linux | youmustbejoking,demon,co,uk | Northumberland | Army | + Use more efficient products. Use less. BE MORE ENERGY EFFICIENT. You can never tell which way the train went by looking at the tracks. _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr