Hi Matt, Haha, that's funny. I forgot to check there.
Well, never mind then :]. -- Kind regards, Harm van Tilborg Tiscom Hosting B.V. Matt Brookings wrote: > Harm van Tilborg wrote: >> A fix: checking whether `num_names != 0' (but that will not shrink the >> array), or -- it's late so I haven't checked -- just sticking >> `realloc()'s return address directly into `names'. > >> Hope it all clear, and somebody can do something with it :]. > > Thanks. This artifact is already in the bug tracker though. !DSPAM:4b1f3c2332711895220530!
