Yes. The problem user is the top user in the file. Oddly enough, vuserinfo is currently showing the user as existing.
I also checked one of the old domains that hasn't been touched since the upgrade, and the vpasswd format was the same as I indicated. (We were running 5.2.1) - Michael Rick Macdougall wrote: > Michael Johnson wrote: >> Checked against a domain added just yesterday, and the entries match >> in fields: >> >> _boxname_:_cryptpass_:1:0:_comment_:_directorypath_:_quota_:_clearpass_ >> >> ___________________________________________________________________ >>> >>> Check the vpasswd file. Most likely you are missing a : at the end >>> of that user because the old 5.2 didn't have one of the fields that >>> 5.4 does, >>> >>> Add the : at the end f the users line and run vpasswd > > Hi, > > All the lines in the vpasswd file ? Including the one before the user > with the problem ? > > Regards, > > Rick > > >
