John Simpson wrote: > On 2006-04-16, at 0639, Robin Bowes wrote: > >> It also calls different "scripts" for each hook rather than having one >> monolithic "something's changed" script. Would that be a better approach >> for vpopmail? > > i don't think so. if you want to use this kind of approach, you can > create an "onchange" script which looks like this: > > #!/bin/sh > if [ -e ~vpopmail/etc/$1 ] > then > exec ~vpopmail/etc/$* > fi > logger -t onchange ignoring command "$*" > exit 0 > > and then create scripts in ~vpopmail/etc with names matching the "cmd" > parameter sent to the "onchange" script.
That will still exec the script for every OnChange event. >>>> would it be better to use the vpopmail function names for all of the >>>> notifications, so that they are all consistent? if so, now is the >>>> time to make the decision, since nobody (as far as i know) has >>>> written any onchange scripts which would look for specific strings. >>> >>> I don't really care. Robin - what do you think the names should be? >>> >>> As far as I'm concerned, all I need is a complete list in front of me >>> when I sit down to write the script. >> >> I don't really care either, but they should be consistent - add_user or >> user_add, but not a mix. > > since nobody really cares, i'm just going to leave them the way they are. Ahem, I said I didn't care as long as they were consistent! R.
