Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail 5.3.27 - repost

[X-Istence]

Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:

At 01:29 AM 9/19/2003, X-Istence wrote:

So then we started getting these messages in our logs:

@400000003f69830f2c2df1b4 info msg 47: bytes 1153 from 
<*************> qp 70866 uid 0
@400000003f69830f2ca1d1c4 starting delivery 60: msg 47 to local 
*******************
@400000003f69830f2cae02dc status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
@400000003f69830f34a902ac delivery 60: success: did_0+0+1/
@400000003f69830f34c072ac status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
@400000003f69830f34c0a18c end msg 47

This was basically allready better than having it fail to call 
vdelivermail, but this is still wrong, as an entry should look like 
this:

@400000003f69850e2b908cbc info msg 94300: bytes 5286 from 
<******************> qp 41793 uid 0
@400000003f69850e2bb94684 starting delivery 4877: msg 94300 to local 
******************************
@400000003f69850e2bbf0efc status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
@400000003f69850e2c7fcebc delivery 4877: success: 
address:_/usr/local/vpopmail/domains/********/*********/Maildir//quota:_104857600/did_0+0+1/ 

@400000003f69850e2c91c07c status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
@400000003f69850e2c91d7ec end msg 94300
But like i said it was an improvement.


Are the messages being delivered? Different log output 
notwithstanding, you haven't said whether the changes you made fixed 
the root problem of message non-delivery.

Paul Theodoropoulos
http://www.anastrophe.com
Paul Theodoropoulos
http://www.anastrophe.com





The messages are NOT being delivered. That is what i meant to prove by 
the differences in the log files, sorry if i didnt make this clear.