On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 11:05, Nick Harring wrote:
> Rather than questioning why we would refuse to accept from > non-reversible hosts, why don't we ask why anyone would set a host up > without reverse DNS?
Rather than question why you've deliberately broken your mail server, I should explain to you why some people running legit servers don't comply with your arbitrary requirements?
A better question is why I'm wasting my time trying to explain things to someone who top-posts and sends HTML to mailing lists.
rather than trumping up your argument with etiquette fascism, how about pointing out a relevant RFC that backs up your [baseless] opinion that a mailserver must accept messages from a site without reverse DNS?
ever heard of RFC 2505? apparently not.
Paul Theodoropoulos
http://www.anastrophe.com
http://folding.stanford.edu
The Nicest Misanthrope on the Net
