-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hello Clayton,
Friday, March 7, 2003, 5:01:31 PM, you wrote: > Yeah.. I agree that it should be in the usage for it, it would make sense > since it's not a numerical value so nobody would logically guess it. I'll patch that the next time I fiddle with the SpamAssassin stuff (most likely later today) Best regards, Gabriel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.0.2i iQEVAwUBPmi1Y8Za2WpymlDxAQFL2gf/WoNXQVaSZyktahDMuiHhN5scp+0Gy5hS dZDpnkexF4msJ3ct/ZjvBI79IhNOXxT6CjV1nWx89S22FCFre4VTtBWJmZV8xXnT zzgieViFhMwmSia0pgXGAuCWL2px2Em7bD6na4yc191bWAcGlhnJSurpxyfnfqPG 6rb1QtQmre94EVwRPIX+YLm5pyzvFjW4XSqAJHNeX8wXeNwC+oY53p3JAvQQx/Ol 7SFykvOrYALhdhgnnjXkuxdO+1pxDTxIUviw/EJ81GVBfNmRVphW0tM7vR/0W9j9 pMh8WwHGmVt1nfWG6zbOY72v0Y6JgKAf93X3a1Q/4GjMw9QNqfZaxg== =Y5L6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
