I agree, it would be very useful -- we have a client who has several
employees they wish to be admins, but would rather have it specifically
applied to that user rather than a general account.
Looking over the Vpopmail source, I do not think it will be that difficult
to incorporate, and update program may be necessary to create a new column
in each MySQL DB.
On the other hand, QmailAdmin may be more of a challenge. Bill understands
it better than I, so its best to leave that to him.
IMO.
== Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brad Dameron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bill Shupp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 3:40 PM
Subject: RE: 0.83 patch
> Speaking of MySQL. There is one feature that should be implemented. There
> should no longer be a requirement to use "postmaster" as the
> admininistrator. There should be an additional entry in the database that
> says if a user is a admin or not. This would allow different usernames as
> well as multiple admin's as requested from some of my users.
>
> ---
> Brad Dameron Network Account Executive
> TSCNet Inc. www.tscnet.com
> Silverdale, WA. 1-888-8TSCNET
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Shupp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 9:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: 0.83 patch
>
>
> Ken, all:
>
> I've posted a patch that brings qmailadmin 0.82 to a 0.83 candidate:
>
> ChangeLog:
> http://shupp.org/patches/ChangeLog
>
> INSTALL:
> cd qmailadmin-0.82
> lynx --source http://shupp.org/patches/0.83-patch.gz | patch -p0
> ./configure <options>
> make ; make install-strip
>
>
> I've tested it with both cdb and mysql modules, and seems to work. Please
> report any issues to the list.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bill Shupp
>
>
>
