Very soon.

As far as I know there are no known bugs or new features needed for
the cdb and mysql modules. They are stable and ready for 5.0.
The oracle, postgresql, sybase and ldap modules are stable but do
not support all the new features, like auth logging. 

Ken Jones

alexus wrote:
> 
> any ideas of the date on upcomin release? at least vpopmail?
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 10:19 PM
> Subject: Re: sqwebmail 3.0 won't compile:(
> 
> >
> > The sqwebmail 3.0 specifically uses the 4.10.30 devel release since
> > 4.10.30 is the release canidate for the new 5.0 stable version.
> > The api in 4.10 has new functions that 4.9 does not have, and some
> > of these functions are in sqwebmail 3.0.
> >
> > The release goal is to have a new stable set
> > sqwebmail  3.0
> > vpopmail   5.0
> > qmailadmin 1.0
> > vqadmin    2.0
> >
> > Ken Jones
> >
> > alexus wrote:
> > >
> > > i said *stable* vpopmail ... which is 4.9.10 and not even close/near to
> > > 4.10.30!
> > >
> > > i asked if its possible to use new stable sqwebmail (3.0.0) w/ stable
> > > vpopmail (4.9.10) not development edition (4.10.30)?
> > >
> > > how can i make myself more clear?
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "alexus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Cc: "Tim Hunter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 7:06 PM
> > > Subject: Re: sqwebmail 3.0 won't compile:(
> > >
> > > > alexus wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > that's what i thought....
> > > > >
> > > > > so there is no way to use stable and latest version of vpop and
> stable
> > > and
> > > > > latest of sqwebmail?
> > > >
> > > > I just installed and tested the sqwebmail 3.0 and vpopmail 4.10.30
> with
> > > > cdb module and everything works fine. Make sure you read the sqwebmail
> > > > INSTALL file. There are new things you have to do with sqwebmail 3.0
> > > >
> > > > Ken Jones
> > > >
> >

Reply via email to