> So I don't see any reason to have them supervised.
> Unsupervised it makes it
> easier to kill them. then i don't have to learn svscan syntax :)
>
> I was talking to one Senior admin at an ISP and his reason for
> not running supervise that if qmail/tcpserver dies, then there
> is something else wrong with the machine and he wants to find
> out about it rather than having it be restarted.
He must be senior enough to not have to go on-call and get paged at 4:30 in the
morning :-)
I'd prob use svok or svstat to generate an alert if fails - but still use svscan so i
can sleep soundly.
Then again - it's probably never failed.
Donal
