It might just be me being picky.
I set up a new domain - quoff.com
Unlike Bill's setup, everyone has webmail. So I logged straight in and sent
myself an email
Here are the headers.
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 11581 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2001 09:15:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO quoff.com) (127.0.0.1)
by localhost with SMTP; 14 Jun 2001 09:15:36 -0000
Received: from 158.152.123.80
(SquirrelMail authenticated user [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by webmail.i9000networks.com with HTTP;
Thu, 14 Jun 2001 09:15:36 -0000 (GMT)
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 09:15:36 -0000 (GMT)
Subject: Test 1
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.1.2)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
I then setup my personal options in SM (In the options tab) and sent a
second email.
Headers below.
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 11599 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2001 09:16:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO quoff.com) (127.0.0.1)
by localhost with SMTP; 14 Jun 2001 09:16:23 -0000
Received: from 158.152.123.80
(SquirrelMail authenticated user [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by webmail.i9000networks.com with HTTP;
Thu, 14 Jun 2001 09:16:23 -0000 (GMT)
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 09:16:23 -0000 (GMT)
Subject: Test 2
From: "Kieran Barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.1.2)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
I didn't like the way the first email was from
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I prefer (and so do my users) to have
From: "Kieran Barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
With a real name and possibly a different email address other than
postmaster@
This information is stored in squirrelmail/data
as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
chosen_theme=../themes/default_theme.php
show_html_default=0
full_name=Kieran Barnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
prefix_sig=1
I have a script that automaticly creates this file when I first add the user
and the domain. Which works perfectly for the master account.
It falls down when the postmaster adds users himself/herself for his/her
friends and they use WebMail. But then again, they are not our direct
customers - so its not our problem. (Is that a bad attitude to take)? Oh
well.
Hope this helped. It might not matter to other people but it mattered to me!
--
Regards,
Kieran Barnes
Signum 1226 Ltd
Visit our website at http://www.1226.net
Phone: 01772 622889 || Fax: 01772 622558
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Katz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 13 June 2001 19:09
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Web-based server-side mail clients
>
>
> It was mentioned that SquirrelMail required some fiddling around to
> get it to work with virtual domains properly. What exactly is involved
> here? Any good step-by-step instructions out there?
>
> Thanks,
> Steven
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Shupp
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 10:50 AM
> To: Qmail; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Web-based server-side mail clients
>
>
> I would say SquirrelMail. While SqWebMail is template
> driven, a decent
> amount of the HTML is embedded in the C source code. Once
> you've compiled
> it, you can't change it until you edit the source code and
> recompile. It
> can be done, but I think SquirrelMail is easier to customize.
>
> -Bill Shupp
>
> on 6/13/01 12:43 PM, Qmail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake:
>
> > Which client is easier to customize the "look and feel" of?
> >
> > Lance
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Steven Katz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 7:44 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Web-based server-side mail clients
> >
> >
> > Thanks, Kieran. From the screenshots of both, SquirrelMail
> appears to
> > have a nicer-looking interface. Do both handle qmail and virtual
> > domains equally well? Whose IMAP server should I use?
> >
> > Thanks again,
> > Steven
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kieran Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 4:20 AM
> > To: 'Steven Katz'
> > Cc: Vchkpw Mailing List (E-mail)
> > Subject: RE: Web-based server-side mail clients
> >
> >
> > Depends on your preference.
> >
> > Two very good ones - in my opinion are SqWebMail and SquirrelMail
> >
> > SqWebMail
> > http://www.inter7.com/sqwebmail
> > Written in C.
> > No need for an IMAP server.
> > Very fast. Might be a little tricky to install if your "a newbie"
> >
> > SquirrelMail
> > http://www.squirrelmail.org
> > Written in PHP.
> > Requires an IMAP server.
> > Very fast and almost modular.
> >
> >
> > I supply SquirrelMail for my clients. For no special
> reason. Both are as
> > good as each other - again, in my opinion.
> >
> > Depends on your user load too. I'd recommend SqWebmail for larger
> > installations. 1,000+ users, but then again, that depends on your
> hardware.
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Kieran Barnes
> > Signum 1226 Ltd
> > Visit our website at http://www.1226.net
> > Phone: 01772 622889 || Fax: 01772 622558
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Steven Katz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> Sent: 12 June 2001 19:43
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: Web-based server-side mail clients
> >>
> >>
> >> Which Web-mail packages are compatible with qmail + vpopmail? Any
> >> favorites?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Steven
> >>
> >
>
>
