I would define compile apache and php, but the rest you can use debian
packages.
Rick
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Simon Hung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, October 30, 2000 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: Qmail + chkpw + courier-imap + mysql + horde + imp + apache +
php inside Debian's potato ?
>> Simon Hung wrote:
>>
>> Hi , it me again.
>>
>> Qmail + chkpw + courier-imap + mysql + horde + imp + apache + php
>>
>> Does anyone using pre-compiled binary of the above combination
>> inside debian potato ??
>> Whis is the benefit of self compile VS debianized ??
>>
>> Thanks
>> Simon Hung
>
>If you are running a standard distribution, where library
>versions are closely versionized, then a pre-compiled
>binary is much better.
>
>If you are dealing with portability issues, then compiling
>the source is less time consuming. Because it eliminates
>the administrative overhead of managing machines entire
>package versions.
>
>If you are loading from a CD then precompiled makes
>alot of sense. Especially for hardware/software suppliers.
>
>Ken Jones
>http://www.inter7.com/vqsignup/
>
