Mark Chesney wrote:
> i just think the administrator should have more control over pop usernames.
> if your email address was [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the current naming
> convention, your pop username would be brad%theinternet.com. but if you had
> control over the naming system you could shorten it to something like 'bfp'
> or 'bfp1' if 'bfp' is already taken. you tell me which is easier on the
> user.
It's not like yo uhave to type it for every session. And I think
bfp923 is a lot less clear then brad%theinternet.com.
> not to mention how many email clients would choke on the previous. why
> should i have to tell a client, "well, if you're using netscape messenger,
> use this delimiter, and if your using hotmail use this delimiter, and if
> your using outlook express version facafooey, use this delimiter."
That's another matter.
Emile
