That's interesting.
Is that in the user manual?
I had tried it in the past (older versions of Vbox),
but always ended up having to set up the bridge, which
is not a straightforward procedure.
JD
Johannes Kastl wrote:
On 3/12/09 11:40 PM Clint Dilks wrote:
I recently upgraded from VirtualBox-2.1.2_41885_rhel5-1.x86_64.rpm to
VirtualBox-2.1.4_42893_rhel5-1.x86_64.rpm on a CentOS 5.2 Host (64
Bit). This trashed the bridged networking setup that I had configured
in 2.1.2 where I had vbox0 and vbox1 talking to br0. From reading the
new documentation it seems that I am now just supposed to select host
interface and then br0 which I have done. Generally this seems to be
Im not sure, but I think all the "bridge"-hacking should no longer be
necessary, you could use hostinterface with your "real" device (eth0,
wlan0, ...).
Regards,
OJ
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
vbox-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-users
_______________________________________________
vbox-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-users
