On Wed, 21 Jan 2026 15:43:31 GMT, Quan Anh Mai <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Since I overrode `MyValue1::equals` in #1929 , `TestIntrinsics` has failed 
>> with `-XX:PerMethodSpecTrapLimit=0 -XX:PerMethodTrapLimit=0`. The failed 
>> test is this one:
>> 
>>     // Value class array creation via reflection
>>     @Test
>>     public void test51(int len) {
>>         Object[] va = (Object[])Array.newInstance(MyValue1.class, len);
>>         for (int i = 0; i < len; ++i) {
>>             Asserts.assertEQ(va[i], null);
>>         }
>>     }
>> 
>> During parsing, `Array::newInstance` is not inlined, so `va` is of type 
>> `Object[]` and `va[i]` is of type `Object`. `Asserts.assertEQ` calls 
>> `va[i].equals(null)` which resolves to a `CallJavaDynamic` with its receiver 
>> of type `Object`, which is passed in as an oop. During incremental inline, 
>> It is revealed that `va` is a `MyValue1[]` and `va[i]` is of type 
>> `MyValue1`. This allows the devirtualization of `va[i]::equals`. Since this 
>> is a method call on a value object, the calling convention changes, which 
>> leads to the assert because the input is an oop.
>> 
>> I relaxed the assert a little bit to allow changing of the calling 
>> convention due to devirtualization.
>> 
>> Please take a look and leave your review, thansk a lot.
>
> Quan Anh Mai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   assert that we are during devirtualization of calls

Great! That looks good to me.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by thartmann (Committer).

PR Review: 
https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1935#pullrequestreview-3688050846

Reply via email to