On Fri, 14 Nov 2025 16:50:15 GMT, David Beaumont <[email protected]> wrote:
> Rewrite of VerifyJimage test to fix several severe issues. > > This test runs in two modes, one of which is completely broken (but claims to > pass) and the other which currently works but must be made compatible with > up-coming preview mode changes from Valhalla. > > Issue 1: Broken file comparison > > This is a mode not currently run by default, but very very broken if it is > run manually. It creates incorrect entry names for looking into the jimage > and then ignores non existent entries without raising a failure. This code > must have been broken since the introduction of BasicImageReader and the > modules system. > > This is the larger part of the VerifyJimage code, and it was never going to > be worth keeping much of the existing code, so I wrote a new nested class > (DirectoryContentVerifier) to encapsulate it. > > Importantly, this version now checks false positives and false negatives for > file comparison, ensuring that "true failure" cannot be silently ignored. The > set of entries in the jimage which have been handled is recorded, and a check > is made that all entries have either been tested or explicitly ignored. > > Issue 2: Use of BasicImageReader for class file reading > > A relative small part of the original code, this mode was reading class names > via BasicImageReader and attempting to load them. This approach works now, > but will fail when preview mode is introduced since preview versions of > classes must be loaded when the JVM is run in preview mode. > > The best way to get "the current set of classes in the jimage" is to > enumerate the jrt:/ file-system for the runtime image (which will account for > preview mode when it's introduced). So the new code in ClassLoadingVerifier > does this. > > Issue 3: File comparison mode was never run by default > > This is likely why the broken file comparison mode wasn't discovered for > years. I added two test stanzas to VerifyJimage, so that both modes are run > (if possible). Some care is needed because in CI testing there are no module > directories for the file comparison mode, and this should not cause a test > failure. > > This is a clone of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/28265 @david-beaumont Your change (at version a00261ae55b6d60a66a9ed35aea4b69302507e6b) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1737#issuecomment-3542703346
