On Tue, 2 Sep 2025 17:49:28 GMT, Frederic Parain <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Since the removal of Q-types and the notion that nullability was not part of 
>> the Java type, there was an awkward situation because nullable arrays of 
>> value types and null free arrays of value types had each a different Java 
>> mirror when they were in fact supposed to have the same Java type.
>> In order to accommodate to the new situation, that arrays can have 
>> properties (nullability, flatness, atomicity, etc.) that are not part of 
>> their Java type, the 1-1 relationship between the *ArrayKlass and the Java 
>> mirror must be broken.
>> The proposed solution is to dedicate one instance of ObjArrayKlass to 
>> represent the Java type of the array in the JVM, and have this instance 
>> being the counterpart of the Java mirror of the array, and have several 
>> instances of RefArrayKlass and FlatArrayKlass that represent the refinements 
>> of the Java array type. Each RefArrayKlass/FlatArrayKlass encodes the 
>> characteristic of a Java array for a given element type and a set of 
>> properties.
>
> Frederic Parain has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
> additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Forgot a TODO

src/hotspot/share/cds/archiveBuilder.cpp line 827:

> 825:         num_obj_array_klasses ++;
> 826:         type = "ref array";
> 827:     } else if (k->is_objArray_klass()) {

Is this redundant? I think flat arrays union ref arrays = obj arrays?

src/hotspot/share/cds/cdsEnumKlass.cpp line 92:

> 90:   }
> 91:   oop oop_field = mirror->obj_field(fd.offset());
> 92:   Klass* oop_field_klass = oop_field->is_objArray() ? 
> oop_field->klass()->super() : oop_field->klass();

Hmm, what does this do? I assume `is_objArray` tests if something can be 
converted to Java `Object[]`. In this case, CDS should check if the component 
type of the array instead of the array supepr class, I think? The original code 
did not call `super()`.

-------------

PR Review Comment: 
https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1452#discussion_r2317612466
PR Review Comment: 
https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1452#discussion_r2317611161

Reply via email to