On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 11:39 AM Guillaume Grossetie <grosset...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for your answer Ben. > > > Perhaps V8 could be made smart enough to distinguish between benign > > and non-benign prototype tampering but the subset that can be proven > > safe is probably so small that it's not worth the complexity and > > overhead. > > Yes, I agree. > Alternatively, could v8 use the pre 7.1 impl of Array#splice when the > prototype has been modified? > Obviously, this is easier said than done and I'm guessing that it might not > be an easy task. > But it's worth noting that the pre 7.1 impl performance (with and without > prototype tampering) were similar. > Not sure how it was all made possible... but it was great for us :) > > Anyway thanks again for your input! > Have a nice day
Older versions of V8 called out to this JS-with-extensions code: https://github.com/v8/v8/blob/7.0.1/src/js/array.js#L599-L642 - I don't speak for the V8 team but I don't believe they're looking to return to that approach. If Array.p.splice() performance is vital to you, you can try open-coding it. I did something similar in Node.js a few years ago, to great effect: https://github.com/nodejs/node/commit/d3f8db124463e478420d8bba6fa5cf13af7b4ecb -- -- v8-users mailing list v8-users@googlegroups.com http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to v8-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/v8-users/CAHQurc9N8HCcKnnpvBFdnGfHRYRoiWF8pSVgqBgRyOP8_2MZfw%40mail.gmail.com.
