LGTM2

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 7:02 AM Daniel Bratell <bratel...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Seems the automatic script failed to pick up this intent so it never ended
> up on the todo list for our weekly meetings. Sorry about that.
>
> Anyway, looking good. In stage3 if I understand things corrrectly which
> means that it has standards support, and with Mozilla's implementation
> there should be no major compatibility problems.
>
> LGTM1
>
> /Daniel
>
>
> On 2020-03-24 06:42, Frank Tang wrote:
>
> ping
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 3:05 PM Mounir Lamouri <mlamo...@google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> non-owner LGTM based on the above. 2 out of the 3 ICU bugs were pointed
>> by Mozilla in their bug tracker as a reason to not launch yet.
>>
>> -- Mounir
>>
>> On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 at 14:59, Frank Tang <ft...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>>> It start from a user request and I put together this PR. Mozilla folks
>>> identified some bugs in the ICU library and we just fixed them and make it
>>> available recently. The PR is not merged because ECMA 402 will only merge
>>> this PR if one of the engine shipt it and since I draft the PR it will
>>> depend on this launch to unblock the merge.
>>>
>>> It was pending on the fix of the following 3 ICU bugs and they are now
>>> all fixed.
>>> https://unicode-org.atlassian.net/browse/ICU-20967
>>> https://unicode-org.atlassian.net/browse/ICU-20738 (assignee forget to
>>> mark it but will soon)
>>> https://unicode-org.atlassian.net/browse/ICU-20739
>>>
>>> These fix also make our v8 implementation pass some failed test in
>>> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2090002
>>> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2095394
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 12:32 PM Mounir Lamouri <mlamo...@google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mozilla seems to have this implemented but Nightly only so I think it
>>>> would be reasonable to have their position updated from "Public Support" to
>>>> "In Development". FWIW, it seems that Mozilla is keeping this in Nightly
>>>> because the spec wasn't stable but it was a while ago.
>>>>
>>>> I also think it would be reasonable to consider Web Developers to be
>>>> positive as this came from a user request
>>>> <https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/issues/300> that was initially on
>>>> Stack Overflow
>>>> <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53477403/how-to-format-milliseconds-with-intl-datetimeformat-api>
>>>>  and
>>>> the same person said that solved their use case
>>>> <https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/pull/347#issuecomment-494714886>.
>>>>
>>>> -- Mounir
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 at 11:56, Daniel Bratell <bratel...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What is the current state of the spec change? It looks like the PR is
>>>>> still open and not much has happened since last autumn. Preferably there
>>>>> should be an agreed upon spec before something is changes, or at the very
>>>>> least, the spec change and the shipping should happen close to each other.
>>>>>
>>>>> /Daniel
>>>>> On 2020-03-18 17:54, Frank Tang wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> ping
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 12:50 PM Frank Tang <ft...@chromium.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Contact emails ft...@chromium.org,js...@chromium.org Explainer
>>>>>> http://shorturl.at/adiZ4 Spec
>>>>>> https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/pull/347 TAG review No TAG review
>>>>>> since the TC39 and ECMA402 will cover that. Summary Enhance the
>>>>>> Intl.DateTimeFormat API by adding a “ fractionalSecondDigits” option to
>>>>>> control the format of fractions of a second. Link to “Intent to
>>>>>> Prototype” blink-dev discussion
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!searchin/blink-dev/Intent$20to$20Implement$3A$20Add$20millisecondDigits$20option$20to$20Intl.DateTimeFormat%7Csort:date/blink-dev/WXd9nh03a1M/z7QeIMgrBgAJ
>>>>>> Risks
>>>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility low. *Firefox*: Public support (
>>>>>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1568134) *Edge*: No
>>>>>> public signals *Safari*: No public signals *Web developers*: No
>>>>>> signals Ergonomics Part of the pre-existing ICU functionality w/o
>>>>>> need of additional data. Activation Should be easy to use by using
>>>>>> w/ pre-existing Intl.DateTimeFormat Security low
>>>>>> Debuggability nothing special. Will this feature be supported on all
>>>>>> six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android
>>>>>> WebView)? Yes Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>>>> ? Yes Tests are added to test262
>>>>>> ./test/intl402/DateTimeFormat/constructor-options-fractionalSecondDigits-invalid.js
>>>>>> ./test/intl402/DateTimeFormat/constructor-options-throwing-getters-fractionalSecondDigits.js
>>>>>> ./test/intl402/DateTimeFormat/taint-Object-prototype-fractionalSecondDigits.js
>>>>>> ./test/intl402/DateTimeFormat/constructor-options-order-fractionalSecondDigits.js
>>>>>> ./test/intl402/DateTimeFormat/constructor-options-fractionalSecondDigits-valid.js
>>>>>> ./test/intl402/DateTimeFormat/prototype/formatRangeToParts/fractionalSecondDigits.js
>>>>>> ./test/intl402/DateTimeFormat/prototype/resolvedOptions/order-fractionalSecondDigits.js
>>>>>> ./test/intl402/DateTimeFormat/prototype/format/fractionalSecondDigits.js
>>>>>> ./test/intl402/DateTimeFormat/prototype/formatRange/fractionalSecondDigits.js
>>>>>> ./test/intl402/DateTimeFormat/prototype/formatToParts/fractionalSecondDigits.js
>>>>>> Tracking bug https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/detail?id=9284 Demo
>>>>>> links http://shorturl.at/adiZ4 Link to entry on the Chrome Platform
>>>>>> Status https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/5704965743968256
>>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>>>>> <https://www.chromestatus.com/>.
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOcELL9W04fz2fEv52cv70LYKJtTm2JavowkCMEjEX6ma%3DaWaA%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOcELL9W04fz2fEv52cv70LYKJtTm2JavowkCMEjEX6ma%3DaWaA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/23063938-a289-cbac-a715-c994392c47ba%40gmail.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/23063938-a289-cbac-a715-c994392c47ba%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/f1167922-909e-4fb1-b331-cf6b42387ec3%40gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/f1167922-909e-4fb1-b331-cf6b42387ec3%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
-- 
v8-users mailing list
v8-users@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"v8-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to v8-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/v8-users/CAOMQ%2Bw9c1r2PxhAYVFs-SJpF0uaveFvdH2j0FgpXwVPe0X-1oQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to