Hi all, I have re-read the document, and I think it's basically ready.
Please find below just a few nits that I could notice. Best, /Marco =================== - Section 12 --- HPKE should actually be referred to as RFC 9180 - Section 17 --- s/is is/is - Section 17.1.3 --- s/utlize/utilize - Section 17.1.4 --- s/in accordance to/in accordance with - Section 17.1.7 --- s/the a post-handshake/a post-handshake - Section 17.4.1 --- s/recommendations what/recommendations about what --- s/identifer/identifier --- s/recomments/recommends - Section 18 --- s/has lead/has led - Section 19 --- s/this document RECOMMENDS that/it is RECOMMENDED that (RECOMMENDS is not a term from BCP 14) - Section 20 --- s/[RFC6979] ECDSA/ECDSA [RFC6979] -- Marco Tiloca Ph.D., Senior Researcher Phone: +46 (0)70 60 46 501 RISE Research Institutes of Sweden AB Box 1263 164 29 Kista (Sweden) Division: Digital Systems Department: Computer Science Unit: Cybersecurity https://www.ri.se
OpenPGP_0xEE2664B40E58DA43.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list -- uta@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to uta-le...@ietf.org
