Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-uta-require-tls13-06: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-require-tls13/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # Internet AD comments for draft-ietf-uta-require-tls13-06 CC @ekline * comment syntax: - https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md * "Handling Ballot Positions": - https://ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ ## Comments ### S4 * "When the API allows it, clients SHOULD specify just the minimum version they want." I struggled with this phrasing and attempting to reconcile it with the broader goal of requiring TLS1.3. What is really meant here, and could it be more clearly stated? ## Nits ### S5 * "At this time it was published" -> "At the time it was published" _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list -- uta@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to uta-le...@ietf.org
