> Small correction: BoringSSL has an implementation as of around November. Our 
> main DTLS application (WebRTC) is still in the process of integrating it, so 
> we may yet find that we messed something up, but in principle it's working 
> now.

Thanks for that update, David. Are people okay with this sentence, adding a new 
introductory clause:
        As DTLS 1.3 is not widely available or deployed,
        this prescription does not pertain to DTLS (in any DTLS version); it 
pertains to
         TLS only.

> Second point is the text about NIST:

I removed that section in the editor's draft[1].  I'll wait a week or two 
before submitting in case the WG has concerns.


[1] 
https://richsalz.github.io/draft-use-tls13/#go.draft-rsalz-uta-require-tls13.html


_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list -- uta@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to uta-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to