> On Apr 22, 2024, at 07:37, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> > wrote: > > Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-uta-ciphersuites-in-sec-syslog-05: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-ciphersuites-in-sec-syslog/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks for the work done in this document. > > Abstract (and section 1): s/The Syslog Working Group published/The IETF > published/
Fair point, we can make that change. > Section 1: what is "out-of-date" in `the use of out-of-date TLS/DTLS versions` > ? TLS 1.2 is not yet obsolete. Suggest to use "not recent" or "not the > latest". > Does this qualification collide with `Implementations of [RFC5425] MUST > continue to use TLS 1.2` of section 4 ? RFC 6012 so it does actually refer to DTLS 1.0, which is now historic, so it’s right there, but yeah 1.2 isn’t yet there. We can change that to something like "not the latest". spt _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
