> IMHO any document that modifies the consensus can't be informational and must instead update RFC 9325 and become part of BCP 195.
> Further, such a document should indicate precisely how it has modified the consensus in RFC 9325, which draft-rsalz-uta-require-tls13 doesn't yet do. Excellent points! Captured at https://github.com/richsalz/tls12-frozen/issues/9 _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
