Hi all, I think I will not raise any objection to draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis. I might write a different draft that says "all of the IETF IDNA documents are misleading, the internet runs on UTS-46", but that is not specific to this draft.
You can inspect the problem here: https://util.unicode.org/UnicodeJsps/idna.jsp It's not difficult to predict the winner, imho, but reasonable people can disagree. I think this PR is good: https://github.com/richsalz/draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis/pull/88 in the sense that there is nothing technically wrong, and it is well-written (not my work). What a pain. Of course, you do have to know about this problem to use TLS in applications, but I think I'm in the rough here. thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
