You have my condolences, that is more important than IDNA in DNS and TLS. When the time is right, I suggest looking at this message: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/KbtvWrG5vdW6iq0scwWpBc1xeM8/
That is a mess, and I don't think it makes sense to paper over it in your draft. thanks, Rob On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 2:03 PM Peter Saint-Andre <stpe...@stpeter.im> wrote: > On 1/29/23 3:01 PM, Rob Sayre wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 1:59 PM Peter Saint-Andre <stpe...@stpeter.im > > <mailto:stpe...@stpeter.im>> wrote: > > > > On 1/29/23 2:51 PM, Rob Sayre wrote: > > > Well, this certainly isn't called for: > > > https://github.com/richsalz/draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis/issues/85 > > <https://github.com/richsalz/draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis/issues/85> > > > <https://github.com/richsalz/draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis/issues/85 > > <https://github.com/richsalz/draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis/issues/85>> > > > > > > I wrote a completely sensible issue, and you closed it with no > > > explanation. > > > > I see nothing unreasonable in asking you to raise issues on the > > canonical venue for working group discussion. > > > > > > Come on, I did both. You're being a little bit jerky. > > Well, my dog died yesterday, maybe I'm in a bad mood. > > But I'm going to defer to the WG chairs on all this. > > Peter > > >
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
