Hi,

This is a major new version, addressing (to the best of our knowledge) all 
pending review comments, primarily from IESG members. Do let us know if we 
missed anything.

>From the change log:

Addressed IESG feedback, ARTART review by Cullen Jennings, and TSVART review by 
Magnus Westerlund.
Improved the rationale for still recommending TLS 1.2.
Specified TLS 1.3 as a MUST for new transport protocols and a SHOULD for new 
application protocols.
Clarified TLS-only vs. dynamic upgrade for non-HTTP protocols.
Clarified distinction between implementation and deployment.
Clarified applicability to QUIC.
Further specified what to do on reaching the confidentiality limit or integrity 
limit.
Added a note about post-quantum cryptography.
Improved the text about Encrypted Client Hello.

Thanks, and have a great IETF week!

        Yaron

On 7/24/22, 18:21, "uta-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of 
internet-dra...@ietf.org" <uta-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of 
internet-dra...@ietf.org> wrote:


    A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
directories.
    This draft is a work item of the Using TLS in Applications WG of the IETF.

            Title           : Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer 
Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS)
            Authors         : Yaron Sheffer
                              Peter Saint-Andre
                              Thomas Fossati
      Filename        : draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-10.txt
      Pages           : 45
      Date            : 2022-07-24

    Abstract:
       Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security
       (DTLS) are used to protect data exchanged over a wide range of
       application protocols, and can also form the basis for secure
       transport protocols.  Over the years, the industry has witnessed
       several serious attacks on TLS and DTLS, including attacks on the
       most commonly used cipher suites and their modes of operation.  This
       document provides the latest recommendations for ensuring the
       security of deployed services that use TLS and DTLS.  These
       recommendations are applicable to the majority of use cases.

       An earlier version of this document was published as RFC 7525 when
       the industry was in the midst of its transition to TLS 1.2.  Years
       later this transition is largely complete and TLS 1.3 is widely
       available.  This document updates the guidance given the new
       environment and obsoletes RFC 7525.  In addition, the document
       updates RFC 5288 and RFC 6066 in view of recent attacks.


    The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis/

    There is also an HTML version available at:
    https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-10.html

    A diff from the previous version is available at:
    https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-10


    Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at 
rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts


    _______________________________________________
    Uta mailing list
    Uta@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta


_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
Uta@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta

Reply via email to