On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 11:32 PM Rob Sayre <say...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 19:48 Peter Gutmann <pgut...@cs.auckland.ac.nz> > wrote: > >> Andrei Popov <andrei.po...@microsoft.com> writes: >> >> >The TLS 1.3 adoption document you reference seems to be based solely on >> Web >> >browser data: > > > Firstly, this comment is not true. The document covers many interactions. > There are non-browser clients, embedded products, and server-to-server > interactions in there. >
Here is a more recent report: https://www.f5.com/labs/articles/threat-intelligence/the-2021-tls-telemetry-report I definitely agree that there are valid reasons to support 1.2. Further, the document does a good job of explaining how to do that. I just don't see a reason to require 1.2. thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
