On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 05:33:32PM -0400, John Levine wrote:

> Kind of. I use the same key for all of the certs for the many names
> that each of my mail servers have so I have one TLSA record and a lot
> of CNAMEs. That's probably bad practice for some reason but whatever.

Actually, I'd say that TLSA record CNAMEs are a fine practice.  If the
underlying servers in fact share the same key, then centralising the
TLSA record management in one place reduces the odds that you'd forget
to update one of them when the server key rolls over.  Better a robust
well managed shared key, than lots of keys poorly managed.

Speaking of DANE deployment, today mijndomein.nl enabled inbound DANE
for 184k customer domains, making them the #3 DANE SMTP hosting provider
by MX-hosted domain count.

The total number of DANE SMTP domains is now 3.53 million.  Yes, Gmail
and so MTA-STS probably has more users, but DANE has 2 to 3 orders of
magnitude more domains.

Looking at the top 15 MX hosting providers of DNSSEC-signed customer
domains the numbers are:

    # domains   hosting zone        DNSSEC/DANE?
    ---------   ------------        ------------
    2,322,925   google.com          -
    1,461,637   ovh.net             -
    1,249,420   one.com             DANE
      578,352   outlook.com         -
      279,564   hostpoint.ch        DANE
      194,551   googlemail.com      -
      185,512   mijndomein.nl       DANE
      172,483   infomaniak.ch       DANE
      167,874   argewebhosting.nl   DANE
      156,585   transip.email       DANE
      139,405   aftermarket.pl      DNSSEC
      115,664   hostnet.nl          DANE
      110,050   mailprotect.be      -
      107,427   domeneshop.no       DANE
       98,172   loopia.se           DANE

-- 
    Viktor.

_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
Uta@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta

Reply via email to