Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.i...@gmail.com> writes: >Ben Kaduk asked why we only added TLS 1.2 Extended Master Secret support as a >SHOULD, and we tend to agree (given widespread support of this feature) that >is needs to be a MUST [1]. We would appreciate the group’s input before we >make this change.
This, alongside MUST EtM for the same draft, is like asking "should having brakes and safety belts in cars be a MUST, or do you think a SHOULD will be OK?", it's such a no-brainer that I'm surprised there's a need to ask. Of course both EMS and EtM MUST be a MUST. Peter. _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
