I re-read the document. It's very nice. A few nits, I think all are editorial
and can be fixed later. I support moving this doc forward.
I note that you say "use encrypted client hello when it's ready" Do you want
to make the same recommendation for DTLS 1.3?
Do you want to say anything about EdDSA and the kerfuffle going on in cfrg@
mailing list right now? No is a good, and probably sane, answer.
4.3 needs a tweak to get {RFC8446, Section 9.1} right.
4.4, do you want to say why 2**24.5 is used for both? Simpler and therefore
easier to get right?
5. Should the applicability statement include things like QUIC and NTS?
5. Rather than refer to 2026, I think you should refer to the BCP whatever it
is.
6.1 Should the references to RFC6125 be changed to the draft 6125bis?
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
Uta@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
