Interesting. That's possible. Actually, let me step back. Not to be stupid, but reading the RFC, is there a clear statement on when an MTA should send TLSRPT reports? Sending them to a domain to whom you've never communicated before seems a bit odd, but I actually can't figure out (at a quick skim) if sending reports for periods in which you did not communicate with the MTA is recommended or not.
It *seems* weird to me. But--and I realize this is an odd question--is it
clear that this is not working-as-intended per the RFC?
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 6:07 PM James Cloos <cl...@jhcloos.com> wrote:
> >>>>> "DM" == Daniel Margolis <dmargo...@google.com> writes:
>
> DM> Google should only be sending TLSRPT reports for time periods in which
> DM> there was mail sent.
>
> They send me daily reports for each of my tlsrpt zones to which they've
> sent any mail since they started grabbing the .well-knowns. But not for
> those to which they have never sent mail.
>
> A no-mail report looks like:
>
> {
> "contact-info" : "smtp-tls-report...@google.com",
> "date-range" : {
> "start-datetime" : "2019-04-26T00:00:00Z"
> "end-datetime" : "2019-04-26T23:59:59Z",
> },
> "organization-name" : "Google Inc.",
> "report-id" : "2019-04-26T00:00:00Z_redacted"
> }
>
> -JimC
> --
> James Cloos <cl...@jhcloos.com> OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6
>
--
How's my emailing? http://go/dan-email-slo
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
