Hi all,
Title : Use of TLS for Email Submission and Access Authors : Loganaden Velvindron Stephen Farrell Filename : draft-ietf-uta-tls-for-email-01.txt Pages : 5 Date : 2019-03-07Abstract: This specification updates current recommendation for the use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol to provide confidentiality of email between a Mail User Agent (MUA) and a Mail Submission Server or Mail Access Server. This document updates RFC8314.
Instead of rewording all the sentences mentioning TLS 1.1 to now mention TLS 1.2, why not say to follow the recommendations of BCP 195?
Example: OLD "As soon as practicable, MSPs currently supporting Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) 2.x, SSL 3.0, or TLS 1.0 SHOULD transition their users to TLS 1.1 or later and discontinue support for those earlier versions of SSL and TLS." NEW "As soon as practicable, MSPs currently supporting Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) or TLS versions that MUST NOT be negotiated per [BCP195] recommendations SHOULD transition their users to a later TLS version encouraged to be used by [BCP195] and discontinue support for those earlier versions of SSL and TLS." -- Julien ÉLIE « Le rire est une chose sérieuse avec laquelle il ne faut pas plaisanter. » (Raymond Devos) _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
