> > > My idea of an ideal end-state for hop-by-hop security for e-mail is > > > that: > > > > See, this is why we often say that IETF folks should not generally try > > to design UI things: > > What on Earth made you choose to be so condescending here? Do I not get > to express my personal preferences?
I'm sorry. I didn't mean to condescend, and please accept my apology for having worded it badly. > How about a response to the substantive parts of my post? The only part I was addressing was the suggestion of prominent UI indications, which I do not think is a good thing for the reasons I've said: Almost all users will not understand at all what the indications mean, and many will understand incorrectly to the point of being misinformed by them. Barry _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
