On 2018-05-08 19:00, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
>
>> On May 8, 2018, at 12:50 PM, Leif Johansson <le...@sunet.se> wrote:
>>
>>> For the record, I agree that the specification *could* be changed along
>>> the lines discussed. I am not actively advocating for the change.
>>
>> but you're not violently opposed either?
>
> Not violently opposed, provided the text makes the MX RRset processing
> obligations on the sender sufficiently clear. As already noted, a bit
> more care is required to not make certain mistakes.
>
Then if somebody could take the pen and craft text we can se if the WG
can reach consensus.
Cheers Leif
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
Uta@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
