Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts-17: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Some questions on use of normative language: 1) sec 3.3.: Is there a reason that you not always use normative language for the recommendation regarding rate limiting? e.g. "...we suggest implementions may limit further attempts to a period of five minutes or longer..." or "A suggested timeout is one minute, and a suggested maximum policy size 64 kilobytes". (also a nit here s/implementions/implementations/) 2) Also in sec 8.1. and 8.2 you maybe want to use normative language as well...? 3) And there also a few cases in section 10.2 where normative language could be appropriate/help: "we strongly recommend implementers to prefer policy "max_age" values to be as long as is practical." and "we suggest implementers do not wait until a cached policy has expired before checking for an update" and "MTAs should alert administrators to repeated policy refresh failures long before cached policies expire" _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
