> > Regarding arguments in favor of supporting SNI, Jim made the best attempt > in this thread to come up with a motivating use case, and I don't find it > very compelling. >
I don't know, I think people will find good uses for it if it becomes available. For example, here's one: virtual SMTP providers. One company maintains the core infrastructure, others build businesses that focus on branding, marketing, and support. Easy to do at scale with SNI, difficult without. Just an idea. That said, I of course agree that it's not the same as with HTTP. -- Ivan
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
