On 23/10/17 17:11, Ivan Ristic wrote: > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Daniel Margolis <dmargo...@google.com> > wrote: >> Ivan's language seems fine to me, for the most part, but I still wonder if >> it wouldn't make STS implementation harder for MTA developers than the >> alternative (which is to just say you can't use SNI with STS). >> > > Why would it make implementation harder? SNI has been widely supported for > a very long time in client libraries.
Yet another callback to handle (both OpenSSL and GnuTLS, server side). -- Jeremy _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
