>
> Section 3.1.3.
>
> I'm surprised that there's not even a SHOULD CONSIDER [RFC6919] for SCSV
> here. Did the WG discuss having any requirement for SCSV?
>
The WG has been struggling to keep the BCP from turning into a list of
things we might wish were true instead of describing what is (or at
least seems to be) true at this time.
Are you sure this one doesn't fall into the first category?
I'll leave everything else for the authors.
Cheers Leif
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
Uta@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
