Thank you for the response.  3.6dB NF is not impressive however I was
considering a wideband LNA as an once-for-all solution for the entire
frequency range 50-6000MHz of N310.

Let me re-phrase the question in two different ways:
1) What is the minimal discernible signal (MDS) at the input of the N310
receiver if no external LNA is used?

2) If only thermal noise is fed into the N310 receiver, (-103.9dBm for
10MHz bandwidth) what is the output power or power spectrum density
(dBm/Hz) at the output of receiver? Suppose the calibration between dBFS
and dBm is done correctly. In theory, a receiver with Noise Figure of 5.8dB
adds 5.8dB to input noise, therefore output power of the receiver would be
-98.1dBm. However I am not quite sure about if this is applicable to near
thermal noise floor. A spectrum analyzer has a NF of 3dB but the noise
floor displayed might be 20dB above the thermal noise floor.

I am especially interested in the band of 500-1000MHz, but answers for
other bands are helpful as well.

Many thanks!

Zhongyuan Zhao

PhD Candidate,
Department of Computer Science & Engineering,
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Office Hour: WF 9:30-10:00am, Avery Hall 12,
Suite 117, Schorr Center,
Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0115


On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users <
usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:

> On 05/13/2018 03:24 PM, David Bengtson via USRP-users wrote:
>
>> The Receiver Noise figure should include sampling noise and ADC ENOB.
>> Is that a free space path loss? You don't have any design margin for
>> fades/blockages etc, so an External LNA might be a good idea. 3.6 dB
>> NF isn't particularly low for a LNA, but it will help.
>>
> Technically, the equivalent noise figure of the ADC is "swamped" by the
> gain stages ahead of the ADC.
>
> System noise chain analysis usually (not always) gets increasingly boring
> the further away from the antenna you get, because noise figures
>   of "deep" stages are diluted considerably by the aggregate gain of the
> stages ahead of them...
>
>
>
> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Zhongyuan Zhao via USRP-users
>> <usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am trying to calculate the link budget for USRP N310.
>>>
>>> Suppose I want a SNR of 20dB,
>>> the signal bandwidth is 10MHz,
>>> the thermal noise floor is -103.9dm.
>>> Receiver noise figure is 5.8dB (N310 datasheet 5.8dB @1.8GHz)
>>> Rx Antenna Gain 6dBi
>>> Path loss: 120dB
>>> Tx Antenna Gain 6dBi
>>> RF cable Loss (RX+TX): 1dB
>>>
>>> Then my TX power before TX antenna should be
>>> -103.9dBm + 20dB + 5.8dB - 6dBi + 120dB -6dBi + 1dB = 30.9dBm
>>>
>>> The receive signal strength at RX port of USRP = -78.1dBm
>>> The noise strength at RX port of USRP = -103.9dBm
>>> The SNR before receiver is 25.8dB, after receiver is 20dB.
>>>
>>> However, due to the sampling noise and effective bits of ADC, I doubt
>>> that
>>> the noise floor after the receiver would be much higher than -103.9dBm +
>>> 5.8dB = -98.1dBm, e.g. -90dBm?, in that case my receive SNR would be
>>> lower
>>> than 20dB.
>>>
>>> Does anyone know the output noise floor (or sensitivity) of USRP N310
>>> receiver (e.g. RX2 port) in 500-1000MHz band? e.g. in the unit of dBm/Hz?
>>>
>>> That would help me to decide if an external LNA is necessary. If so does
>>> some typical wideband LNA with a gain of 20dB and noise figure of 3.6dB
>>> would be enough.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you!
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Zhongyuan Zhao
>>>
>>> PhD Candidate,
>>> Department of Computer Science & Engineering,
>>> University of Nebraska-Lincoln
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> USRP-users mailing list
>>> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
>>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> USRP-users mailing list
>> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> USRP-users mailing list
> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to