Oh, and here is the relevant code from GitHub:
https://github.com/EttusResearch/uhd/blob/release_003_010_001_001/host/cmake/Modules/UHDVersion.cmake#L63

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 4:46 PM, Dave NotTelling <dmp250...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Martin,
>
>      I tried the following:
>
>           cd /tmp
>           git clone https://www.github.com/EttusResearch/uhd
>           cd uhd
>           git checkout release_003_010_001_001
>           cd host
>           mkdir build
>           cd build
>           cmake ..
>
>      And I get the same experimental warning at the end.  I did notice
> that this message gets printed out fairly early on:
>
>
>           -- Working off of feature or development branch. Updating
> version number.
>           -- Using UHD Images Directory: OFF
>           -- Build type not specified: defaulting to release.
>
>
>      I assume that is happening because `git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD`
> is returning `HEAD` as opposed to something like `UHD-3.9.LTS` for the
> UHD-3.9.LTS branch.  In case it matters, I am running git version 2.17.0.
> Am I just doing the checkout wrong?
>
>
>      Anywho, long story short, it sounds like I can trust that anything
> with a release_* tag is stable code.
>
>
> Thank you!
>
>
> -Dave
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Dave NotTelling <dmp250...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Martin,
>>
>>      Ron is correct, it's a warning at the end.  I hadn't considered the
>> CMake cache.  I'll give that another go later.
>>
>> Thank you both!
>>
>> -Dave
>>
>> On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 7:59 PM, Ron Economos via USRP-users <
>> usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It looks like this near the end of cmake. Not an error.
>>>
>>> -- ######################################################
>>> -- # UHD disabled components
>>> -- ######################################################
>>> --   * GPSD
>>> --   * E100
>>> --   * E300
>>> --
>>> -- ******************************************************
>>> -- * You are building a development branch of UHD.
>>> -- * These branches are designed to provide early access
>>> -- * to UHD and USRP features, but should be considered
>>> -- * unstable and/or experimental!
>>> -- ******************************************************
>>> -- Building version: 003.010.003.HEAD-0-gef157678
>>>
>>> Ron
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/02/2018 04:51 PM, Martin Braun via USRP-users wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 05/02/2018 11:04 AM, Dave NotTelling via USRP-users wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Are versions >= 3.10 still considered experimental?  I thought that any
>>>>> version with a release_XXX_XXX_XXX was considered stable.  When I run
>>>>> cmake ../ on any version 3.10 or higher it warns me that I am on a
>>>>> development branch.
>>>>>
>>>> Our current maint versions are 3.11.*.
>>>>
>>>> 3.12.* is currently not released as a tagged version, so consider that
>>>> 'unstable'. I would not like to call them 'experimental', though. When
>>>> we put stuff into master branch, we have some confidence it's good.
>>>> However, we do occasionally slip up on testing there, and also, we have
>>>> no guarantee with regards to API stability on master.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure why you're seeing that CMake error, though. Maybe it's a
>>>> caching artefact? What exactly are you compiling?
>>>>
>>>> -- M
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> USRP-users mailing list
>>> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
>>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to