Thanks Nicolas, now it is clear.
2018-02-26 12:17 GMT+03:00 Nicolas Cuervo <nicolas.cue...@ettus.com>: > Hi Dmitry, > > RFNoC is supported fully only on top of the rfnoc-devel branch, so that is > the branch you'd want to use for any custom development. We will merge > fixes from master into rfnoc-devel really soon, but if you are having > issues that are already solved in maint of master, I believe cherry-picking > them into rfnoc-devel might be the easiest before the official merge. > > Regards, > - Nicolas > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Дмитрий Михайличенко via USRP-users < > usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> could anybody advise if rfnoc-devel branch is regularly synchronized to >> maint branch? >> >> In my case I use rfnoc-devel branch because I want to develop custom >> RFNoC blocks. From the other hand I need fixes for X310 device I use which >> are published in maint branch. Should I continue to use rfnoc-devel and >> apply necessary maint fixes by hand or it is better to switch to maint >> branch and try to move necessary RFNoC blocks to maint? And which version >> of FPGA sources should I use? >> >> thanks, >> Dmitry >> >> _______________________________________________ >> USRP-users mailing list >> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com >> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com >> >> >
_______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list USRP-users@lists.ettus.com http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
