You need to create apache account first, then create ticket here
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN
Patrik Iselind <patrik....@gmail.com> 于2020年5月18日周一 下午11:07写道：
> I'm not allowed to create tickets in your Jira. What's the procedure to
> get a Jira account?
>
> I have other issues with Zeppelin as well, like I cannot give my Spark
> executer (local[*]) however much RAM I want. This means that I'm not using
> all my available RAM, which limits how many executors I can have chewing
> at the problem. Changing spark.driver.memory and spark.executor.memory
> doesn't seem to make any difference. There's something else that blocks how
> much RAM my executers can get.
>
> So it might make sense that I get my own Jira account, if you'll have me.
>
> Patrik Iselind
>
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 3:56 PM Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It is not supported to inject env into interpreter setting for now, could
>> you create a ticket for it ?
>>
>> Patrik Iselind <patrik....@gmail.com> 于2020年5月18日周一 下午6:52写道：
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I'm using Zeppelin through a docker image. In this setup, I'd like to
>>> version control my conf/interpreters.json file along with my Dockerfile and
>>> other related files. This I can of course do already. There's a problem
>>> related to this though.
>>>
>>> When setting for example the AWS credentials in the interpreter
>>> configuration, then I'm forced to write them out in clear text. I really
>>> don't want to version control the credentials!
>>>
>>> I've tried setting AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID to "${AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID_VAL}" but
>>> that doesn't work. It will not expand. Setting AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID to
>>> "${AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID}",
>>> will not work as it will expand recursively.
>>>
>>> For this reason I think it would be great if Zeppelin support
>>> configurations that are of the type "expandable string" which would read
>>> from the environment to expand the variable values once. That would allow
>>> me to version control my interpreters.json without having to include my AWS
>>> credentials.
>>>
>>> Using the "password" type will only hide the password in the UI, it's
>>> still cleartext in the interpreter.json file.
>>>
>>> Do you see some other solution that might work here?
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Patrik Iselind
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Jeff Zhang
>>
>
--
Best Regards
Jeff Zhang
