+1 I think this is one of the most important features. don't know why this requirement has been skipped.
/afancy On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Belousov Maksim Eduardovich < m.belou...@tinkoff.ru> wrote: > Hello, users! > > At the moment our analysts often use mixes of interpreters in their notes. > > For example, they prepare data using %jdbc and then use it in %pyspark. > Besides, they often use scheduling to make some regular reporting. And they > should do something like `time.sleep()` to wait for the data from %jdbc. It > doesn`t guarantee the result and doesn`t look cool. > > > > You can find early attempts to implement sequential running of all > paragraphs in [1]. > > We are really interested in implementation of the issue [2] and are ready > to solve it. > > It seems a good idea to discuss any requirements. > > My idea is to introduce note setting that defines the type of running to > use (parallel or sequential) and leave "Run all" to be the only button > running all the cells in the note. This will make sequential or parallel > running the `note option` but not `run option`. > > Option will be controlled by nearby button as shown > > [image: > https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/jwnb7xfb0fPbFg1CWPoMSqovu7ecSMv4pJfuP4zdKVZbyAUDwzAT2GJ5EiemXVYrqMW73yklemTpjXNyLRJABpTCoHi6us2ZI_AxWKHwZpBEA7MjpMP0-7Nk8saaJQfIF4yBMPfS] > > > > > > For new notes the default state would be "Run sequential all", for old - > "Run parallel for interpreters" > > We are glad to hear any thoughts. > > Thank you. > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1165 > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2368 > > > > > > > > > *Maksim Belousov * > > >
