I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2003
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:56 PM, Jongyoul Lee <jongy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for replying it. I'll make a PR for doing it. > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Prabhjyot Singh < > prabhjyotsi...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1. >> >> Yes, agreed I too think its overhead, and all the features can be >> achieved via JDBCInterpreter. >> >> On 23 January 2017 at 10:45, Jongyoul Lee <jongy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> We, currently, have two kind of Interpreter supporting to connect DB >>> which are PostgresqlInterpreter and JDBCInterpreter. In history, >>> JDBCInterpreter is based on PostgresqlInterpeter and has the same function >>> with it. I suggest to remove PostgrsqlInterpreter in Zeppelin's code base >>> because they have same functions and JDBCInterpreter is now de facto >>> standard. All new contribution based on JDBC function is provided and added >>> onto JDBCInterpreter. In old times, I suggested same thing but it wouldn't >>> be accepted because PostgresqlInterpreter was better then JDBCInterpreter >>> at that time. But, now, JDBCInterpreter include all functions of >>> PostgresqlInterpreter and provide better functions. >>> >>> How do you guys think of it? If it's accepted, 0.8.0 won't have >>> PostgresqlInterpreter anymore. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Jongyoul Lee >>> >>> -- >>> 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 >>> http://madeng.net >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Warm Regards, >> >> Prabhjyot Singh >> > > > > -- > 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 > http://madeng.net > -- 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 http://madeng.net
