On 4 Jan 2016 at 11:22:29, Peter Huisman (p.huis...@ximm.nl(mailto:p.huis...@ximm.nl)) wrote:
> For us it is very important to have it available in the next 6 release since > it is a big part of our backup and portability part. I would really > appreciate it if this could be done :-) Note that this issue has been there since XWiki 5.2.4 so it’s not really new ;) Also note that independently of whether we merge it in the 6.4.x branch, you can always do it for your own version by checking the “Commit” tab in JIRA and applying the patch to your branch. Of course I understand that it’s simpler for you if we do it but we need Thomas’s opinion on this (I wouldn’t want to risk stability of the 6.4.x branch for such an old issue that is not critical). Thanks -Vincent > Br, > > Peter > > Op 4 jan. 2016, om 11:20 heeft vinc...@massol.net het volgende geschreven: > > > > Hi Peter, > > > > No it’s not been fixed in 6.4.x. Maybe Thomas has decided not to backport > > it since it could a bit dangerous? Thomas? > > > > Thanks > > -Vincent > > > > On 4 Jan 2016 at 11:02:58, Peter Huisman > > (p.huis...@ximm.nl(mailto:p.huis...@ximm.nl)) wrote: > > > >> Hi Vincent, > >> > >> Thanks for the prompt response and great to hear that it is already fixed! > >> I am wondering (since I can’t find it easily) if you also have fixed in > >> the latest 6.x series since we are not ready to move to 8. > >> > >> Br, > >> > >> Peter > >>> Op 4 jan. 2016, om 10:59 heeft > >>> vinc...@massol.net(mailto:vinc...@massol.net) het volgende geschreven: > >>> Hi Peter, > >>> On 4 Jan 2016 at 10:55:49, Peter Huisman > >>> (p.huis...@ximm.nl(mailto:p.huis...@ximm.nl)(mailto:p.huis...@ximm.nl)) > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> I have a question regarding the import of a XAR. > >>>> > >>>> When we do an import of a XAR (exported with the History), we have > >>>> noticed that - when the document NOT contains an attachment - the > >>>> version history of the document is identical to the original (obviously > >>>> as expected). However, when the document contains an attachment, it look > >>>> like a new version of the document is created with the comment being > >>>> identical to the last available comment. We have experimented with file > >>>> an DB store (since we have multiple servers in use with different > >>>> setups) but that does not solve this issue. > >>>> > >>>> 1 - Is this the expected result? > >>>> 2 - Is there a way to work around this (in our case) unwanted result? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks in advance for looking at this. > >>> > >>> I think you’ve experienced http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-9960 which > >>> we’ve just fixed. > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> -Vincent > >>> > >>>> Br, > >>>> > >>>> Peter > > > _______________________________________________ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
